|
This article originally provided by
The Daily
Mail
January 9, 2007
Lawmakers want study of coal slurry in drinking water
By TOM BREEN
Associated Press Writer
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) -- The West Virginia Coal Association may not
understand why legislators are asking about coal slurry and groundwater when the
matter is before a Mingo County circuit court.
But lawmakers said Monday that they cannot ignore their constituents' concerns
about the possibility of coal waste contaminating drinking water and endorsed a
resolution calling for a comprehensive study of the matter.
For months, a joint interim subcommittee has been studying whether coal waste
pumped into tapped-out underground mines could poison local drinking water.
Until Monday, though, the association representing the state's mining industry
hadn't weighed in at one of the subcommittee's meetings.
Association Senior Vice President Chris Hamilton told lawmakers he was surprised
they were even considering legislation on the topic, since a lawsuit involving a
slurry injection system is heading for trial in Mingo County.
"We're interested in why the legislature or this committee would try
substituting itself for the judiciary,'' Hamilton said.
He told lawmakers that the Mingo County operation is the only one of 12 slurry
injection systems that has been challenged in terms of safety for residents and
the environment.
Hamilton said while drinking water quality may be an issue in parts of West
Virginia, there is no correlation between active mining operations and
contaminated wells.
State officials estimate that about a half-million state residents rely on wells
or hauled water for their drinking supply.
In previous meetings, the committee heard testimony from coalfield residents who
link health problems to contaminated water, and from Ben Stout, a biology
professor at Wheeling Jesuit University, who studied abandoned underground mines
where coal operators inject slurry waste.
Stout and his team tested more than 170 springs, streams and wells around the
Mingo County mine sites last year. Among other findings, the testing showed
unsafe levels of iron, manganese and sodium in 42 percent of the wells.
Stout also noted that tests on water from one resident's hot water heater found
"phenomenal'' levels of dangerous metals and chemicals, leading him to wonder
whether hot water heaters could be acting as a concentrating factor.
Delegate Robert Tabb, D-Jefferson, told Hamilton that lawmakers cannot ignore
the volume of complaints and entreaties from residents.
"It almost seems like you're telling us it's none of our business,'' Tabb told
Hamilton. "I take exception to that.''
The subcommittee voted to endorse a resolution calling for a study by the
Department of Environmental Protection and the Bureau of Public Health into the
effects of coal slurry injection on drinking water and the environment. The
resolution calls for the study to be finished by Jan. 1, and will now move to
the full Judiciary Committee for consideration.
But Tabb, in the face of opposition from members of the subcommittee, agreed to
table a proposal that would require mining companies with coal slurry injection
systems to buy bonds that would pay for the cost of cleanup if there is a spill
or break. Committee members said they didn't have enough time to properly study
the proposed bill.
|